|
July 10, 2002
News this month
Using lab discoveries to test for bladder cancer
A group of researchers
at Yale University recently reported on a discovery that could lead
to the development of a quick and easy test for bladder cancer.
Finding a biomarker called survivin in the urine of patients meant
with a high degree of reliability that the patient had either new
or recurrent bladder cancer.
Up to now, the only tests to accurately diagnose bladder cancer
onset or recurrence have been cytoscopy and urine cytology. Both
have drawbacks. The discovery of a new method could help the thousands
diagnosed with the disease each year. Bladder cancer is the fourth
most common type of cancer in men, the eighth in women. It is more
common in men than women, in people age 40 and older and in people
who smoke cigarettes.
Encouraging results
Dario Altieri, MD, from Yale University School of Medicine, was a lead researcher for the study, which involved 158 patients. Urine from groups of patients seen at two medical centers in the New Haven, Conn., area was divided into five groups:
- 17 healthy volunteers
for the control group
- 30 patients with
nonneoplastic urinary tract disease
- 30 with genitourinary
cancer excluding bladder cancer
- 46 with new or recurrent
bladder cancer
- 35 with treated bladder
cancer
Urine from each patient was checked for the presence of survivin. Past research done by Altieri and others has shown that survivin appears to help cancer cells live longer than they normally should. In each normal cell, there is a shut-off valve of sorts that causes the cell to die on schedule. This process is called apoptosis. But cancer cells don't die as they should and the result is uncontrolled growth. This latest study was published in a January 2001 issue of JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association.
Consistent results
Yale researchers used an antibody to check for the presence of survivin in 158 patients. To double-check their findings, they also used two standard methods: the Western Blot test and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
In addition, the 35 patients who had been treated for bladder cancer
also underwent a cytoscopy exam the same day the urine was collected
to make sure they were cancer free. During cytoscopy, physicians view
the inside of the bladder to detect signs of cancer by guiding a thin
tube that holds a lens and a light up the urethra.
In general, the researchers found:
- All of the 46 patients
with either new or recurrent bladder cancer exhibited the presence
of survivin in their urine.
- None of the healthy
volunteers or patients with prostate, kidney, vaginal or cervical
cancer had detectable survivin in urine samples.
- Survivin was not
detected in the urine samples of 32 of 35 patients treated for
bladder cancer who had negative cytoscopy results.
- Survivin was detected
in three patients with morphological abnormalities of the bladder
or hematuria (blood in the urine), two of whom later went on to
develop bladder cancer.
Test detects protein shed by cancer cells
One major hurdle in designing new diagnostic tests is reducing the number of false positives and false negatives. The false positive rate was 5 percent in this study, which appears at least in this initial series considerably superior to urine cytology, in which a sample of cells from urine is examined under a microscope to look for cancerous cells.
Big push toward new urine tests
In recent years, several new tests for bladder cancer have been placed into development or come on the market. The JAMA study is a first step in the development of a highly specific and reliable test for both new-onset and recurrent bladder cancer.
Physician Referral Online
A free and confidential service
of Yale-New Haven Hospital.
Physician Referral Online
Using your own criteria, you can request information from a database
of 900 area physicians who have registered to participate.
Request an appointment
We would be happy to assist you in scheduling an appointment with
a member of the hospital's medical staff. Use the link above or
call:
203-688-2000
or toll free
1-888-700-6543
to talk with a referral coordinator.
|

|

Using survivin antibodies to detect cancer
Survivin has been established in the medical literature for a number of years as being one of the genes that is almost exclusively expressed in a number of cancers, but not in normal tissues. When thinking of developing a test to detect cancer or a therapy to treat cancer, you would want to focus on a substance that exists only with cancer cells. So it makes sense to use survivin, particularly with bladder cancer.
Survivin is excreted in the urine, allowing it to be collected and checked easily. Testing for a specific substance mirrors a broader trend in cancer detection and treatment toward using more specific rather than generalized treatments. The goal is to strike at cancer cells while preserving healthy tissues.
Lack of reliable screening test
There is a great need for a
reliable, safe and easy test for bladder cancer. Bladder cancer
is now the fourth most common cancer in the U.S., with about 53,000
cases diagnosed each year. Add in the fact that about 80 percent
of cases of bladder cancer recur and you begin to realize the tremendous
need for an accurate and simple test. At present, the best way to
accurately diagnose bladder cancer remains performing cystoscopy
and/or biopsy. These are invasive and sometimes painful tests and
have to be frequently repeated to check for recurrence.
Testing for cancer
Using survivin from urine as the basis of a potential bladder cancer screening test made sense to us early on. Only when cancer is present will survivin be produced and be detected in the urine. Although our results from the JAMA study were initially very encouraging, at that time we felt we were a long way off from developing a screening test using survivin. But in the past year, Yale has entered into an agreement with a diagnostic company to develop such a screening test.
I would think a clinical trial of such a test could start in a relatively short amount of time. The biology is relatively simple and the assay used for the test is straightforward, sensitive and specific to cancer, meaning it could detect 100 percent of the cancers. Of course, before that could happen, it would have to be tested in a large, multicenter trial with hundreds of patients.
Low false positive rate
A good test should have a low false positive rate, that is, showing a positive result when no cancer is present. Our rate was 5 percent, considerably superior to urine cytology.
Three of the patients in our study had hemoturia, blood in the urine, which is a symptom for bladder cancer. In most cases, the presence of blood does not automatically mean cancer but patients must still undergo additional testing to rule out cancer. Two of these patients in our study tested positive for survivin and later went on to develop bladder cancer so the changes we were detecting were very early changes.
How survivin works
Survivin may be protecting cancer cells from cellular suicide and making tumor cells resistant to such forms of treatment as chemotherapy or radiation therapy. While survivin is easy to detect in bladder cancer because it is excreted in urine, detecting it in other types of cancer is more difficult. In these cases, then, we would instead search for an antibody to the survivin protein.
The body naturally forms antibodies as a form of protection to foreign substances. Detecting these antibodies would be much easier than detecting the survivin itself and this is the basis of the research reported in this study.
Ideally, a test could be developed that would be used in the doctor's
office and would be easy and give results quickly.
Dr. Dario Altieri
is a cancer researcher at the Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine
and a professor of pathology at the Yale University School of Medicine.
Yale-New Haven was recognized this year by U.S. News & World Report for its cancer services.
|