|
October 23, 2003
News this month
Transfer for angioplasty benefits heart attack patients
More than a million Americans suffer heart attacks each year.
Treating them with emergency angioplasty at major medical centers
is a better alternative than administering clot-busting drugs at
community hospitals even when a short transfer is required, according
to a major study of heart attacks, published in the New England
Journal of Medicine. Transfer to an angioplasty center improves
a heart attack victim's chances of avoiding major complications
by about 40 percent.
Transfer
improves a heart attack
victim's chances of avoiding major complications by about 40 percent.
Currently most heart attack patients are treated only with clot-busting
drug therapy, called fibrinolysis, even though research indicates
they fare better when treated with angioplasty to clear the clogged
blood vessel responsible for the heart attack.
Many physicians believe angioplasty is appropriate, however, only
for those patients who are seen initially at a medical center that
offers emergency angioplasty. They are reluctant to delay treatment
while patients are transported to another hospital.
Study design
Danish researchers studied a total of 1,572 patients with major
heart attacks. Of these, 1,129 patients were seen at 24 hospitals
that do not offer angioplasty; the remaining 443 were seen at five
hospitals that do offer the service. Patients were either treated
with fibrinolysis or transported to a center offering emergency
angioplasty, providing a transfer could take place within two hours.
Investigators analyzed the rate of complications, including death,
another heart attack and disabling stroke occurring within one month
of the initial heart attack. Results showed that 8.5 percent of
those transferred for angioplasty versus 14.2 percent of those treated
with fibrinolysis suffered a major complication. Rates were similar
among those treated at one of the five hospitals offering angioplasty
where 6.7 percent of those in the angioplasty groups suffered a
complication compared to 12.3 percent of the fibrinolysis group.
Angioplasty patients had fewer second
heart attacks.
The biggest benefit for angioplasty patients was fewer second heart
attacks. Only 1.6 percent of these patients had a second heart attack,
compared to 6.3 percent of those receiving clot-busting drugs. There
was not a significant difference in the occurrence of death or stroke
between the two groups.
Can results be applied to the U.S.?
Since Denmark is a small country with a very different health care
system, physicians question whether these results apply to the U.S.
as well. Some experts think they do.
Dr. Alice Jacobs, who performs angioplasties at Boston University
Medical Center, said in an accompanying editorial,
now
is the time to discard the practice of transporting patients with
acute myocardial infarction to the nearest hospital and to transport
them preferentially to centers of excellence.
Others are not sure, including the lead author of the study, Dr.
Henning Andersen, who said, In my country, we don't have private
hospitals. Everything is paid by the government. In the U.S., a
hospital may be reluctant to transfer a patient because of the income
from that patient.
Other physicians consider geography to be the major issue. Dr.
John Canto, who directs the coronary care unit at the University
of Alabama, said, In Birmingham, we have 16 hospitals, and
12 can do that intervention, but if you are in rural Alabama, I
don't know whether the two hours you would have to drive would be
worth it.
Physician Referral Online
A free and confidential service
of Yale-New Haven Hospital.
Physician Referral Online
Using your own criteria, you can request information from a database
of 900 area physicians who have registered to participate.
Request an appointment
We would be happy to assist you in scheduling an appointment with
a member of the hospital's medical staff. Use the link above or
call:
203-688-2000
or toll free
1-888-700-6543
to talk with a referral coordinator.
|
|
Efficient delivery care system essential
This study demonstrates that if you are having a heart attack,
you can do just as well if you are first taken to a community
hospital and then transferred to a major medical center for angioplasty
if you can get there within a reasonable amount of time.
And that's a big if.
Our goal
is to achieve
the balloon inflation phase of an angioplasty within 90 minutes
of the time a patient presents in the E.D.
Time to treatment
The time it takes to transport a patient can be a critical factor
in large rural states where major centers may be four or five
hours away. In Connecticut, just as in Denmark where this study
was conducted, transport time should not be a problem. With seven
medical centers approved for emergency angioplasty in the state,
it's possible to get patients to a center within an hour from
any of the acute care hospitals in Connecticuteither by
ambulance or helicopter.
The study looked at transport times of up to two hours and found
no significant differences in patient outcomes. Our goal at Yale-New
Haven Heart Center is to achieve the balloon inflation phase of
an angioplasty within 90 minutes of the time a patient presents
in the emergency department (E.D.). We often are able to achieve
this in less time depending on the time the patient arrives.
When someone comes in with a heart attack, the cardiac catheterization
lab is activated, which entails contacting the physicians and
other health care professionals who form the cath lab team. In
the middle of the night, it may take up to 45 minutes to get everyone
in the lab, but often it can happen in less than 30 minutes.
When a patient is being transported from another hospital, it
should only take an additional 15 or 20 minutes provided the E.D.
team at the referring hospital activates Yale-New Haven's cath
lab immediately after assessing the patient. By the time the patient
arrives by ambulance, the cath lab team is ready. We're currently
working with others in the state to ensure the emergency transport
system works as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Angioplasties have been shown
to result in better outcomes for patients.
The angioplasty advantage
Angioplasties have been shown to result in better outcomes for
patients. They dramatically reduce the chances of someone experiencing
a second heart attack. Clot-dissolving medications certainly help
patients, but they effectively open a clogged artery only 50 to
60 percent of the time.
What can you do?
Know the signs and symptoms of heart attacks and seek care immediately
if you suspect you may be having one. And, it makes good sense
to scope out the closest hospital delivering high quality care.
How can you tell? Experience, reputation, research and teaching,
patient satisfaction and other factors are important to consider.
[Read How
to choose a hospital to care for your heart for additional
ways to assess quality.]
Time is of the essence in treating heart attacks, and our advice
would be to call 9-1-1 immediately and ask to
be taken to the closest hospital you believe delivers high quality
care. We would also urge anyone with a history of heart disease
or who is at high risk to develop and sustain an ongoing relationship
with a physician who is trained to take care of patients with
cardiovascular disease. That physician's knowledge of your medical
history is an invaluable advantage to an emergency department.
Are more angioplasty centers the answer?
Many have suggested it might be best for patients if the state
increased the number of angioplasty-approved centers. That would
be the ideal scenario if we could ensure that quality of care
and economics were not affected by creating more centers. At this
time, however, the research indicates the best choice for patients
is treatment at a high volume center.
Study after study has shown that for complex specialized care,
the more experience the health care team has, the better the results.
According to a report published in the Annals of Internal
Medicine (September 17, 2002), the majority of studies find
a lower patient mortality rate for a given procedure when the
hospital or physician has high-volume experience performing that
procedure.
A team that conducts 1,500 to 2,000 angioplasties a year as
we do at Yale-New Haven is much more likely to do a better job
than a smaller center that may perform 200. That doesn't mean
that small hospitals don't deliver good care. They do; but when
we look at large populations of patients, the percentages of good
results favor experience.
Expense is another consideration since training, equipping and
staffing a cardiac catheterization lab for emergency angioplasty
24/7 costs millions of dollars. Putting a small percentage of
those financial resources into upgrading the emergency transport
system might be a better investment. Getting patients to centers
where teams have extensive experience treating those having heart
attacks quickly and effectively offers patients the best chance
of a full recovery. 
Dr. Cabin is a professor of cardiology at the Yale School
of Medicine and an attending cardiologist at the Yale-New Haven
Heart Center.
|