We still don’t know if LVD causes stroke
We’ve known for a long time that
there’s a link between left ventricular
dysfunction and stroke. This study puts a
finer point on it: even mild LVD – not just
moderate to severe LVD – is linked to
ischemic stroke across a multiethnic
population. But the study does not suggest
a causative link, and it doesn’t add
dramatically to the body of literature we
already have.
“Future studies are needed
to evaluate treatment
strategies for patients with
all degrees of LVD with
regard to stroke prevention.”
Most importantly, it does not suggest
any improvements on our approach to
stroke prevention. No study to date has
definitively shown that using blood
thinners, other than aspirin, decreases
the incidence of stroke in patients with left
ventricular dysfunction.
The risk factors for LVD are very
similar to the risk factors for stroke. They
include bad cholesterol levels, high blood
pressure, hypertension, diabetes and atrial
fibrillation. We aggressively treat those
risk factors already with statins, blood
pressure drugs, diet modification, and
antithrombotics, such as aspirin and
Coumadin®.
But does LVD cause stroke? The study
does not answer that question.
Left ventricular dysfunction refers to a
decrease in the heart’s ability to pump
oxygen-rich blood to the rest of the body.
The efficiency of the pumping action is
described by an ejection fraction (EF): the
percentage of the blood in the left ventricle
that is pushed into the arteries with each
heart beat. The authors of the study
considered an ejection fraction of more than
50 percent to be normal, an EF of 41 to 50
percent to be mildly dysfunctional, an EF of
31 to 40 percent to be moderately impaired,
and an EF of 30 percent or less to be
severely decreased.
What they found was what we’d
expect: LVD of any degree was more
common in people who have had ischemic
strokes than in people who have not.
The novel finding of this study is that mild
LVD appeared to raise the risk of stroke as
much as moderate to severe LVD.
Dr. Di Tullio’s study, which is a
case-control study, is liable to bias. Cases
and controls are often not well matched,
particularly in a small trial such as this.
This can make results of case-control
studies difficult to generalize. In addition,
the strokes were not stratified according to
stroke sub-type, such as embolic, small
vessel disease, cryptogenic, etc. It would be
interesting to know if LVD was equally
present in all stroke subtypes or in
selected ones, particularly as one would
generally expect LVD to lead to an increase
in embolic strokes rather than the other
subtypes.
Should this study change the
management of stroke patients or of
patients with left ventricular dysfunction?
Trials evaluating the effect of anticoagulation
with Coumadin® in patients with LV dysfunction are ongoing and will,
we hope, answer the current questions
regarding optimal medical therapy to
prevent stroke in patients with LVD.
This trial suggests that patients with mild
LVD should also be included.
In the meantime, aggressive
management of established stroke risk
factors remains the optimal therapy.
This includes controlling patients’ blood
pressure and lipids, treating atrial
fibrillation appropriately, using
anticoagulation when necessary, and
advising patients to quit smoking, exercise
regularly and adopt a low-fat, low-cholesterol
diet. It also means teaching
patients to seek prompt medical attention
if they experience difficulty breathing, focal
numbness or weakness, or heart palpitations.
The study is interesting, but it doesn’t
dramatically change what we already know
or suggest a new approach to patient care.
It does, however, suggest that future
studies are needed to evaluate treatment
strategies for patients with all degrees of
LVD with regard to stroke prevention.

Dr. Stephen Possick is affiliated with
Cardiology Associates of New Haven.