Does carotid stenting with protection make patients smarter?
These interim study results are
intriguing, but based on preliminary
findings alone there is no way to determine
whether carotid artery stenting with distal
filter protection (CSP) actually improves
memory.
Obvious limitations of this interim
report are the small number of patients in
the CSP group and the absence of
randomization, including a medically treated
comparison group. It’s possible the
patients selected for CSP somehow had an
intrinsically better chance of an improved
outcome, which may lead us to falsely
generalize the results to the entire patient
population.
Furthermore, the CSP group consisted
of both symptomatic and asymptomatic
patients, but investigators didn’t define
what they considered symptomatic.
To avoid misinterpretation, the CSP group
should be stratified into symptomatic and
asymptomatic, and each of these groups
should be well-defined and compared to a
control group. Ideally, each CSP and
control group should also be stratified by
the degree of carotid artery narrowing
present, and surveyed for co-morbidities
for stroke (e.g. hypertension,
diabetes/glucose intolerance, elevated bad
cholesterol, obesity, smoking, excess
alcohol use, heart disease, etc.).
“Without (stringent)
methodology, it’s impossible
to know which patients truly
benefit most, and how much
of the measured cognitive
improvement is due to CSP
as opposed to other possible
interventions, such as the
treatment of stroke
co-morbidities.”
Without this type of methodology, it’s
impossible to know which patients truly
benefit most, and how much of the measured
cognitive improvement is due to CSP
as opposed to other possible interventions,
such as the treatment of stroke
co-morbidities.
Details of the study methodology,
such as patient selection and exclusion
criteria, the training and technique used,
and the competence of the stenting
operators, are lacking. Measurements of
carotid narrowing were not performed
using the same technology in every
patient, and complications of CSP were not
reported. The latter is especially important
since recurrent narrowing of coronary
arteries after stenting has been reported in
as many as one third of patients. Carotid
stenting could yield similar results.
Additionally, studies have shown that
carotid stenting is more likely than CEA to
be associated with emboli, especially
during the angioplasty phase. Without
embolic monitoring, such as real-time
Doppler ultrasound or pre- and post-CSP
diffusion/perfusion imaging studies, we
really don’t know what is happening as far
as embolic phenomena are concerned.
The study also raises theoretical
questions. Cognitive decline is usually the
result of diffuse or multifocal bilateral
brain impairment, such as Alzheimers Disease or multiple bilateral strokes, or of
a one-sided brain process in certain brain
regions, such as the thalamus,
hippocampus or perisylvian cortex. The
thalamus and hippocampal regions derive
their blood supply from the vertebrobasilar
arterial system, not the carotid system.
Therefore it’s somewhat confounding as to
why, in cases of cognitive loss due to
diffuse, multifocal, thalamic or
hippocampal compromised blood flow,
opening up one carotid artery with
stenting would result in a significant
improvement in cognition.
Lastly, the improvement in cognition
was reported in patients six months after
CSP. It remains to be seen whether it will
be sustained at one year and beyond.
It’s possible this study will lead to a
revision in our understanding of brain
pathways and regions subserving
cognitive function, and elucidate the role
of vascular disease in cognitive decline.
It may also provide more impetus for
healthcare providers to screen people at
age 35, or even 25, for stroke and heart
attack risk factors, and aggressively treat
these conditions.
But does CSP make people smarter?
It’s too soon to tell. Until larger,
randomized and controlled studies are
performed, CSP cannot be recommended
for routine management of high-grade
carotid narrowing. Certain exceptions may
exist, such as in the treatment of surgically
inaccessible carotid lesions, or in someone
who has had neck irradiation or significant
trauma. But carotid artery stenting, with or
without protective devices, is not yet the
standard of care.
Norman Werdiger, MD, is Associate
Clinical Professor of Neurology
Yale University School of Medicine
Assistant Chief of Neurology at
Yale-New Haven Hospital.